Filtered by Category: Litigation
A defendant may be concerned that someone may argue that the plaintiff’s allegations must be true since the defendant agreed to pay money. This is why many settlement agreements contain a statement that the defendant is not admitting liability, but is only settling with the plaintiff to avoid further litigation.
Read More
Many people write a will before they die (few after) that identifies who should receive their property after they are gone. An executor may read these instructions and then distribute property accordingly. Sometimes heirs fight and claim that the executor is not interpreting the will correctly or following its instructions. … Some people want to avoid having a will and, instead, set up a trust. There are many benefits to a trust. It could have better tax consequences. It can avoid procedures in court since the trust holds property and, after the decedent dies, the property stays in the possession of the trust and does not need to be distributed. And it can allow for long-term actions under the guidance of a trustee, as opposed to one big distribution upon a decedent's death.
Read More
People often craft a direct examination as if it were just a script on a page. They forget that these questions and answers are a conversation in a courtroom. As a result, those direct examinations sound awkward, repetitive, dull. Better lawyers picture how the examination will play out in court.
Read More
Often, construction projects run over budget and there are shortfalls. At the scale of a large project, these shortfalls can be huge, leading a development company created for that project to declare bankruptcy. In those cases, litigation helps assign blame. The court can determine where the funds will come from to get people paid while attempting to put the property into the hands of someone who can afford to finish developing it.
Read More
Although mediation is generally considered to be less expensive than a full trial, this assumes the mediation is successful. An unsuccessful mediation can be costly and still fail to save any litigation costs. In a mediation, the parties pay for the mediator’s time in reviewing statements, preparing for the mediation, and attending it. Parties also need to calculate their own lost time and pay for the costs of their attorneys to draft the mediation statements and attend the mediation. Accordingly, for litigants on a budget, mediation has definite costs but uncertain benefits.
Read More
Commercial dispute plaintiffs in the United States often get to decide whether to have their claims decided at trial by judge or by a jury. Plaintiffs usually choose juries because they may be more sympathetic to the plaintiff’s claims. But there are also compelling reasons for a plaintiff to have a “bench trial,” in which the judge decides the facts of a case.
Read More
A landlord cannot simply kick out a tenant when she does not pay rent. Instead, there is a process to demand rent and, if need be, seek an eviction. But the tenant may be able to explain why she is not paying rent. Litigation may be how the parties ultimately resolve the dispute.
Read More
Lawyers need to make sure any potential documents are coded for privilege and redacted, even if the documents are not considered responsive to a document request. This is because a non-responsive document may be produced anyway if it is the family member of—attached to or embedded in—another document that is responsive to a request and thus subject to production.
Read More
A plaintiff may not want to wait until the end of a lawsuit to get her property out of the hands of the defendant. Lawsuits could take years. And the defendant, who must not be a good person if she stole the plaintiff’s property, may take bad care of it, destroy it, get rid of it, or hide it.
Read More
When determining whether to settle, it can be difficult for employees and employers to calculate an appropriate amount for the employer to pay. Unlike a contract dispute, where an agreement can set forth an amount due, there is no natural number that can compensate an employee for discrimination.
Read More
Often, parties will make compromises in discovery to avoid the expense and uncertainty of going to court. For example, if a party believes it is entitled to all of a company’s financial records and the recipient believes it is entitled to none, the two may compromise and the recipient may agree to produce some specific financial records.
Read More
Interrogatories may also be useful to define what an adversary’s claims or defenses are. To that end, a party may ask an opponent to identify each fact that supports its claims or each instance of misconduct that it alleges. Although a party may be able to ask the same questions to a party at a deposition, an interrogatory is more likely to get a useful response and less likely to get an “I don’t know offhand” or some other incomplete answer.
Read More