Sworn Statements

An affidavit will often have the “caption” or the name of the relevant lawsuit at the top of the page. Beneath that is usually the title of the document in all caps: AFFIDAVIT OF JANE SMITH. And then after a paragraph that says that the person who signed the affidavit (often called the “affiant”) did so under oath, there are usually a series of numbered paragraphs.

Amended Complaints

If a complaint alleges fraud, the complaint may be vulnerable to a motion to dismiss if it does not allege that the defendant knew her statements were false at the time she made them because that is a necessary component of the claim. If the defendant moves to dismiss on those grounds, the plaintiff may address the deficiency by amending her complaint to include the necessary allegation.

Joint Defense Groups

Counsel for minor participants often listen carefully to each of the joint defense calls to make sure that none of the issues negatively affect their clients. Since the major participants may not be thinking of the minor participants when doing their work, it is up to the minor participants’ counsel to make sure that their clients’ interests are protected.

The Uniform Commercial Code

The UCC provides a lot of rules about what happens in the event of a breach. For example, it holds a seller responsible for the quality of goods it ships until the goods arrive at the buyer’s location, except in certain specific situations. And it sets forth how a buyer can reject defective goods.

Hearsay and Foundation Objections

At trial, technical rules dictate what evidence is admissible and what evidence is not. Not only does this require lawyers to do a lot of work before trial to make sure their evidence is admitted, but it could baffle some people about why some great evidence wasn’t included.

Arbitration

There are several reasons why parties may choose arbitration over litigation. One reason is efficiency: arbitrations tend to move faster than court proceedings. This is because arbitrators often have lighter caseloads than judges and because they have the flexibility to skip various formalities. Also arbitration usually does not permit appeals, which saves the parties the costs of an appeal.

Cross Examination at Trial

Sometimes during cross-examination, things don’t go as planned. The witness may give a bad answer or the judge may cut off a line of questioning even though the lawyer really wanted to continue it. In those events, a lawyer is usually best served by remaining calm. Acting like these are huge losses may communicate to others that even the lawyer thinks their case is in bad shape. And while those losses are scary in the moment, a trial often has numerous opportunities for each side to make its case.

Serving the Summons

Corporate defendants may automatically designate the state government its agent for service of process (or may affirmatively designate some third party to be an agent). In those cases, plaintiffs often may properly serve a defendant by delivering or mailing a complaint to the agent instead of to the company itself.

Representations and Warranties

Many contracts have “indemnification” provisions, that state exactly what a defendant needs to do if a representation is false. For example, the provision may state that the defendant is only responsible for a certain amount of damages or that the plaintiff needs to follow a specific procedure before it can bring a lawsuit.

The Convention on the International Sale of Goods

Parties can determine whether the CISG is helpful for them or not based on whether they prefer its terms over the ones found in another applicable law. But putting those substantive differences aside, I believe that there is a significant benefit to the CISG, and a significant drawback.

Trial Exhibit Lists

The process for making an exhibit list often begins several weeks before a “pretrial conference” with the judge to discuss the trial. Often the judge’s rules or the court’s rules will instruct the parties to exchange proposed lists of exhibits. By exchanging these lists before the conference, the parties can identify the subjects of agreement ahead of time and then present their disagreements to the judge at the conference.

I Don’t Know

The focus of a litigator’s practice is often not to advise clients how to comply with the law in the future, but whether an action in the past violated a legal obligation. And in many situations, virtually no litigator can say with confidence how the law applies to a dispute without a detailed study of various contracts and laws that govern the relationships between the relevant parties.