Comments on Recent Cases: May 2025

Parties in American litigation not only often have the power to conduct deposition interviews of the other parties; normally they can compel non-parties, too. But this power, however, is not unlimited.

Comments on Recent Cases: April 2025

Parties in litigation have very broad powers to ask questions and gain information about the other parties. This often includes information that is irrelevant to the case. But in some instances, courts will put limits on the subjects of inquiry in discovery.

Comments on Recent Cases: March 2025

Parties in litigation have very broad powers to ask questions and gain information about the other parties. This often includes information that is irrelevant to the case. But in some instances, courts will put limits on the subjects of inquiry in discovery.

Comments on Recent Cases: February 2025

After a deposition, a witness should review the transcript of her testimony to make sure that it is accurate. She can note in the “errata” sheet any errors. But the witness can only correct mistakes in the transcription of her words; she cannot alter the substance of her responses in the errata sheet.

Comments on Recent Cases: January 2025

A defendant in litigation may argue that the plaintiff sued in the wrong court. For example, a California defendant may claim that they should not need to participate in a lawsuit in a New York court. And while judges often decide these issues before the parties need to exchange evidence, sometimes courts require a limited exchange of evidence to decide whether the plaintiff chose the right court.

Comments on Recent Cases: December 2024

An important part of litigation is the motion for summary judgment. It is a litigant’s opportunity to avoid a trial on the grounds that the opponent has no evidence that can support her claims or defenses. But to prevail, a movant needs good evidence herself.

Comments on Recent Cases: November 2024

A principal question a lawyer must ask before commencing litigation is who the correct plaintiff should be. Not every plaintiff has standing to bring a lawsuit, and making the wrong choice may not be easy to fix. In some cases this is an easy question, but in others it can be more difficult.

Comments on Recent Cases: October 2024

A party to litigation has a duty to preserve relevant evidence. They can’t just shred everything to leave their adversary without evidence at trial. But parties may disagree about the extent they need to preserve. If a judge decides one side did not preserve enough, she may decide to tell a jury to assume the missing evidence was bad for the party who did not preserve it.

Comments on Recent Cases: September 2024

I wrote a cover story in the most recent issue of Litigation News, a publication of the ABA Section of Litigation. It is about a challenge that journalists made to a Texas law that restricts the use of drones. And while the court ultimately refused to strike down the law, it considered whether the federal government even permits states to regulate the use of airspace and the balance between the right of journalists to take photographs and the ability of the government to restrict certain locations from interference.

Comments on Recent Cases: August 2024

Many lawsuits arise from allegations that the defendant did something terrible. And, consistent with the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant’s conduct was awful, many complaints allege that the defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the plaintiff. But not all misconduct gives rise to an “IIED” claim.

Comments on Recent Cases: July 2024

A major issue that arises in defamation litigation is whether the statement at issue is a fact that can be proven true or false or whether it is an opinion. Only a false statement of fact can be the basis of a damages claim, and so a judge must decide whether the statement is a fact before the question of falsity can go before a jury. And the legal definition of a fact may differ from how many people understand it from generally using the word.

Comments on Recent Cases: June 2024

Litigants often argue to the court that a trial is not necessary because the claims fail as a matter of law or because all of the evidence in the case can only support one side. But there are some kinds of claims that are difficult to dismiss before a trial because the evidence is almost always imprecise and requires a judge or jury to evaluate credibility. Employment discrimination claims, for example, often involve competing statements by witnesses, and so it usually cannot be said that all of the evidence supports only one side.